Supreme Court of the United States, 1956

Van Huffel Tube Corp. v. Bowers

Van Huffel Tube Corp. v. Bowers
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 8, 1956 · No. 66
352 U.S. 804; 77 S. Ct. 30; 1 L. Ed. 2d 38; 1956 U.S. LEXIS 388 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Robert G. Day for appellants. C. William O’Neill, Attorney General of Ohio, and W. E. Herron, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Van Huffel Tube Corp. v. Bowers

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.