Supreme Court of the United States, 1956

Federal Trade Commission v. American Crayon Co.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 8, 1956

352 U.S. 806; 77 S. Ct. 33; 1 L. Ed. 2d 39; 1956 U.S. LEXIS 1839; 1956 Trade Cas. (CCH) 68,497 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Simon E. Sobeloff, then Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Daniel M. Friedman, Earl W. Kintner and Robert B. Dawkins for petitioner. Thomas F. Butler, Jr. for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

McLemore v. Alabama Power Company (Ala. 1969)
Crutchfield Corp. v. Testa (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2016)
City of Phoenix v. West Publishing Co. (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985)
State v. Musgrove (Mont. 1982)
United States v. Matthews (U.S. Army Court of Military Review 1982)
Idaho Ass'n of Naturopathic Physicians v. United States Food & Drug Administration (4th Cir. 1978)
Virginia Foods of Bluefield, Va., Inc. v. Dailey (W. Va. 1977)
Hite v. Cook (Miss. 1972)
Snyder v. Stanford (Ohio 1968)
BALTIMORE CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE v. Schreiber (Md. 1966)
Topps Garment Manufacturing Corp. v. State (Md. 1965)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. The case is remanded with directions as follows: (1) to affirm and enforce paragraphs *807numbered 4 and 5 and the unnumbered paragraph following paragraph numbered 5 of the Federal Trade Commission’s order issued pursuant to § 2 (d) of the Clayton Act; and (2) to consider and pass upon the Federal Trade Commission’s petition for affirmance and enforcement of the provisions of paragraphs numbered 1, 2 and 3 of the Federal Trade Commission’s order issued under § 2 (a) of that Act.

Simon E. Sobeloff, then Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Daniel M. Friedman, Earl W. Kintner and Robert B. Dawkins for petitioner. Thomas F. Butler, Jr. for respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.