Supreme Court of the United States, 1957

Mounce v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 9, 1957 · Per Curiam

355 U.S. 180; 78 S. Ct. 267; 2 L. Ed. 2d 187; 1957 U.S. LEXIS 49 (United States Reports)

Counsel

0. John Rogge for petitioner., Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.

Cases that cite this one

31 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.

United States v. John Darnell, III (2d Cir. 1963)
State v. Jackson (Or. 1960)
State v. Hudson County News Co. (N.J. 1963)
United States v. 392 Copies of a Magazine Entitled "Exclusive" (District Court, D. Maryland 1966)
Henry J. Haldeman v. United States (10th Cir. 1965)
Zeitlin v. Arnebergh (Cal. 1963)
Harold S. Kahm v. United States (5th Cir. 1962)
Excellent Publications, Inc. v. United States (1st Cir. 1962)
In re Louisiana News Company (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1960)
Molasky v. Dayries (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1960)
Commonwealth v. Horton (Mass. 1974)
Ginzburg v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1966)
McCauley v. Tropic of Cancer (Wis. 1963)
Manual Enterprises, Inc. v. Day (Supreme Court of the United States 1962)
State v. Hudson County News Co. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1962)
Monfred v. State (Md. 1961)
Eastman Kodak Company, a Corporation v. John C. Hendricks (9th Cir. 1958)
People v. Berger (Colo. 1974)
People v. Kirkpatrick (Criminal Court of the City of New York 1970)
Luros v. United States (8th Cir. 1968)
People v. Weingarten (Criminal Court of the City of New York 1966)
State v. Martin (Conn. App. Ct. 1965)
State v. LeWitt (Conn. App. Ct. 1965)
State v. Onorato (Conn. App. Ct. 1965)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. Upon consideration of the entire record and confession of error by the Solicitor General the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for consideration in light of Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.