Supreme Court of the United States, 1957

Federal Housing Administration v. Darlington, Inc.

Federal Housing Administration v. Darlington, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 21, 1957
352 U.S. 977; 77 S. Ct. 381; 1 L. Ed. 2d 363; 1957 U.S. LEXIS 1433 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Melvin Richter and Herman Marcuse for appellant.

Federal Housing Administration v. Darlington, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision. The 8 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Probable jurisdiction is noted. In view of the refusal of the appellant to approve rental schedules for furnished apartments in appellee’s apartment project unless appellee agrees not to rent apartments for periods of less than 30 days, a cause of action for injunctive relief is stated. An injunction restraining enforcement of an Act of Congress for repugnance to the Constitution cannot, however, be granted by any District Court unless the application is heard and determined by a three-judge District Court, 28 U. S. C. § 2282. The judgment is *978therefore reversed and the case is remanded for consideration by a three-judge District Court.

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Melvin Richter and Herman Marcuse for appellant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.