Supreme Court of the United States, 1957

Carr v. Beverly Hills Corp.

Carr v. Beverly Hills Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 17, 1957 · Ante, Burton, Frankfurter, Harlan, Sperling, Stated, Their, Whittaker
354 U.S. 917; 77 S. Ct. 1375; 1 L. Ed. 2d 1433; 1957 U.S. LEXIS 666 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Thomas Dodd Healy and George E. Danielson for petitioner. Paul R. Watkins for the Beverly Hills Corporation, and Frederic H. Sturdy for Lordan et al., respondents.

Carr v. Beverly Hills Corp.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed on the authority of Smith v. Sperling, ante, p. 91, decided June 10, 1957, and Swanson v. Traer, ante, p. 114, decided June 10, 1957, and the cause is remanded to the District Court for proceedings in conformity with this opinion.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Burton, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Whittaker dissent for the reasons stated in their dissent in Smith v. Sperling, ante, p. 98.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.