Supreme Court of the United States, 1957

Raley v. Ohio

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 24, 1957 · Clark, Disposition, From, Hampshire, Jurisdiction, Opinions, Set, Stated, Supra, Watkins, Would

354 U.S. 929; 77 S. Ct. 1391 (United States Reports)

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in the light of Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U. S. 234, and Watkins v. United States, 354 U. S. 178.

Mr. Justice Burton would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument. Mr. Justice Clark dissents from this disposition of the case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Sweezy v. New Hampshire and Watkins v. United States, supra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.