Supreme Court of the United States, 1957

Barenblatt v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 24, 1957 · Clark, Consideration, Stated, Supra, Took, Watkins

354 U.S. 930; 77 S. Ct. 1394; 1 L. Ed. 2d 1533; 1957 U.S. LEXIS 594 (United States Reports)

Counsel

David Scribner for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Tompkins, Philip R. Monahan and Doris H. Spangenburg for the United States.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. David Rainey (5th Cir. 2014)
United States v. Rainey (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 2013)
Barenblatt v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1958)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari in this case is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Watkins v. United States, 354 U. S. 178.

Mr. Justice Burton took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Mr. Justice Clark dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Watkins v. United States, supra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.