Black v. Amen
Cases that cite this one
25 later published cases cite this decision. The 22 that cite it most often are listed here.
- People Ex Rel. Averna v. City of Palm Springs (Cal. 1958)
- Oklahoma Radio Associates v. Federal Deposit Insurance (10th Cir. 1993)
- Local Union 499 of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Iowa Power & Light Co. (District Court, S.D. Iowa 1964)
- V (Supreme Court of the United States 1963)
- Lochhead v. Alacano (District Court, D. Utah 1988)
- Superior Oil Co. v. City of Port Arthur (Tex. App. 1981)
- Virginia W. Sperry, Special Administrator of the Estate of Paul A. Munn, Deceased, and Ida Munn v. Edwin R. Barggren and Edwin D. Barggren (7th Cir. 1975)
- Sperry Rand Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. A-T-O, Inc. (Formerly 'Automatic Sprinkler Corporation of America') (4th Cir. 1971)
- Snyder v. Harris (Supreme Court of the United States 1969)
- Thomas v. Colorado Trust Deed Funds, Inc. (10th Cir. 1966)
- Johnson v. Benjamin Moore & Co. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2002)
- Hannon Armstrong & Co. v. Sumitomo Trust & Banking Co. (4th Cir. 1992)
- State Ex Rel. Angel Fire Home & Land Owners Ass'n v. South Central Colfax County Special Hospital District (N.M. Ct. App. 1990)
- Vinson v. Burgess (Tex. 1989)
- Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hospital (3d Cir. 1983)
- Conforti & Eisele, Inc. v. DIV. BLDG. & CONSTR. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1979)
- Carter v. Hamlin Hospital District (Tex. App. 1976)
- City of Waco v. City of McGregor (Tex. 1975)
- Zahn v. International Paper Co. (District Court, D. Vermont 1971)
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp. (District Court, S.D. New York 1965)
- Hatten v. City of Houston (Tex. App. 1963)
- Local Lodge No. 1836, District 38, International Ass'n of Machinists v. Local No. 1505, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (Supreme Court of the United States 1963)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Petitioners' amended motion, concurred in by the attorneys for respondents, is granted. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to remand the cause to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas to enable the parties to file their joint motion for the entry of judgment dismissing the action, as provided in paragraph 3 of the Settlement Agreement dated February 27, 1958, a copy of which is annexed to the amended motion.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter desires to have it added that he assumes that the legal effect of the Court’s order, in which he joins, upon the opinion and judgment of the Court of Appeals in this case is the conventional one when a case has become moot here pending our decision on the merits. United States v. Munsingwear, 340 U. S. 36, 39.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.