Supreme Court of the United States, 1958

Hill v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 2, 1958 · Per Curiam

356 U.S. 704; 78 S. Ct. 1139; 2 L. Ed. 2d 1145; 1958 U.S. LEXIS 944 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Howard Adler, Jr. for petitioner., Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

In re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated November 12, 1991 (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 1992)
Norma Wisnick v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1963)
Coppedge v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1962)
State v. Urioste (N.M. Ct. App. 1980)
Re Edward J. Carvelo (Haw. 1959)
In re Carvelo (Haw. 1959)
Cash v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1958)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for consideration in light of Ellis v. United States, 356 U. S. 674, decided May 26,1958, and also in light of Farley v. United States, 354 U. S. 521; and Johnson v. United States, 352 U. S. 565.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.