Supreme Court of the United States, 1958

Ross v. Schneckloth

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 30, 1958 · Per Curiam

357 U.S. 575; 2 L. Ed. 2d 1547; 78 S. Ct. 1387; 1958 U.S. LEXIS 677 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Petitioners pro se., John J. O’Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Michael R. Alfieri, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent in No. 596, Mise.

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

Hendrix v. City of Seattle (Wash. 1969)
City of Tacoma v. Heater (Wash. 1966)
State Ex Rel. Kennedy v. Boles (W. Va. 1966)
Commonwealth v. Hill (Pa. 1974)
Britt v. North Carolina (Supreme Court of the United States 1971)
Draper v. Washington (Supreme Court of the United States 1963)
Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1962)
Coppedge v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1962)
Cruz v. Hauck (Supreme Court of the United States 1971)
Ross v. Rhay (Wash. 1959)
Medberry v. Patterson (United States District Court for the District of Colorado 1959)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Washington are vacated and the cases are remanded for consideration in light of Eskridge v. Washington State Prison Board, ante, p. 214.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.