Supreme Court of the United States, 1959

Hinkle v. New England Mut. Ins. Co. of Boston

Hinkle v. New England Mut. Ins. Co. of Boston
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 12, 1959 · Per Curiam
358 U.S. 65; 79 S. Ct. 16; 3 L. Ed. 2d 106; 1958 U.S. LEXIS 177 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Leland S. Forrest argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners., Phineas M. Henry argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Vincent V. B. Booth.

Hinkle v. New England Mut. Ins. Co. of Boston

Cases that cite this one

23 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of certiorari in this case is dismissed as improvidently granted. See Layne & Bowler Corp. v. Western Well Works, 261 U. S. 387; Estate of Spiegel v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 335 U. S. 701, 707-708; General Box Co. v. United States, 351 U. S. 159, 165.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.