Supreme Court of the United States, 1959

Rogers v. Calumet Nat. Bank of Hammond

Rogers v. Calumet Nat. Bank of Hammond
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 26, 1959 · Per Curiam
358 U.S. 331; 79 S. Ct. 350; 3 L. Ed. 2d 344; 1959 U.S. LEXIS 1609 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Townsend, George B. Searls and Irwin A. Seibel for petitioner., Charles Levin and Curt C. Silberman for respondents.

Rogers v. Calumet Nat. Bank of Hammond

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. We are of the view that under Silesian-American Corp. v. Markham, 156 F. 2d 793, 796, affirmed, 332 U. S. 469, a state court is without power to review the discretion exercised by the Attorney General of the United States under federal law. The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded to the Appellate Court of Indiana. On remand the Indiana courts are of course free to consider other questions presented by this record in light of General License 94, 12 Fed. Reg. 1457, as it may have affected the definition of “national” in Executive Order 9095, 7 Fed. Reg. 1971, as amended, and Executive Order 8389, 5 Fed. Reg. 1400. See GMO. Niehaus & Co. v. United States, 139 Ct. Cl. 605, 153 F. Supp. 428.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.