Rogers v. Calumet Nat. Bank of Hammond

Supreme Court of the United States
Rogers v. Calumet Nat. Bank of Hammond, 358 U.S. 331 (1959)
79 S. Ct. 350; 3 L. Ed. 2d 344; 1959 U.S. LEXIS 1609
Per Curiam

Rogers v. Calumet Nat. Bank of Hammond

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. We are of the view that under Silesian-American Corp. v. Markham, 156 F. 2d 793, 796, affirmed, 332 U. S. 469, a state court is without power to review the discretion exercised by the Attorney General of the United States under federal law. The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded to the Appellate Court of Indiana. On remand the Indiana courts are of course free to consider other questions presented by this record in light of General License 94, 12 Fed. Reg. 1457, as it may have affected the definition of “national” in Executive Order 9095, 7 Fed. Reg. 1971, as amended, and Executive Order 8389, 5 Fed. Reg. 1400. See GMO. Niehaus & Co. v. United States, 139 Ct. Cl. 605, 153 F. Supp. 428.

Reference

Full Case Name
ROGERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, SUCCESSOR TO THE ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN, v. CALUMET NATIONAL BANK OF HAMMOND, SUBSTITUTED TRUSTEE, Et Al.
Cited By
10 cases
Status
Published