Supreme Court of the United States, 1959

Herrmann v. Rogers

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 26, 1959 · Per Curiam

358 U.S. 332; 79 S. Ct. 353; 3 L. Ed. 2d 345; 1959 U.S. LEXIS 1610 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Burton K. Wheeler and Robert G. Seaks for petitioner., Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Townsend, George B. Searls and Irwin A. Seibel for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision. The 7 that cite it most often are listed here.

Testamentary Trust of Paszotta v. Calumet National Bank (Ind. Ct. App. 1961)
Westerngeco L.L.C. v. Ion Geophysical Corp. (Fed. Cir. 2016)
Hermann v. Brownell (9th Cir. 1960)
In re Trusteeship Under Will of Schmidt (Minn. 1959)
Mtr. of City of New York (Usa Coblentz) (N.Y. 1959)
First National Bank v. Kirschmann (Minn. 1959)
Riley v. District of Columbia (D.C. 1971)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to it, to consider whether, under the law of property of Idaho, it was possible, after the time of the making of the conveyance, for any person other than the named beneficiaries of the trust to acquire a property interest in it (other than through a named beneficiary), and, in the light of its determination as to this, to reconsider its holding that respondent was entitled to all the trust funds remaining in the hands of the trustee.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.