Supreme Court of the United States, 1959

McDaniel v. the Lisholt

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 2, 1959 · Per Curiam

359 U.S. 26; 3 L. Ed. 2d 625; 79 S. Ct. 602; 1959 U.S. LEXIS 1417 (United States Reports)

Counsel

C. Dickerman Williams for petitioner.', James M. Estabrook and Francis X. Byrn for respondent A/S Lise.

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

Leonard v. FedEx Freight, Inc. (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2022)
Roberta A. Uglem, Personal Representative of Allen D. Uglem, Deceased v. Foss Launch & Tug Co. (9th Cir. 1976)
Nikiforow v. Rittenhouse (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1967)
James E. McDaniel Libelant-Appellant v. The M/s Lisholt, Her Engines, Etc., and A/s Lise, Her Owner (2d Cir. 1960)
Yost v. General Electric Company (District Court, S.D. New York 1959)
McDaniel v. The M/B Lisholt (District Court, S.D. New York 1959)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is vacated. The case is remanded to the District Court for a new trial in light of Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 358 U. S. 625.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.