Koller v. United States
Cases that cite this one
24 later published cases cite this decision. The 22 that cite it most often are listed here.
- United States v. Allen F. Price, D/B/A Allen F. Price Machinery Company (6th Cir. 1961)
- United States v. Woodbury (9th Cir. 1966)
- Proffitt v. Federal Deposit Insurance (D.C. Cir. 2000)
- United States v. Telluride Company (10th Cir. 1998)
- United States v. Telluride Company (10th Cir. 1998)
- Patricia A. Johnson v. Securities and Exchange Commission (D.C. Cir. 1996)
- United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Cooperative Grain and Supply Co., Cross-Appellants (8th Cir. 1973)
- United States v. Perry (9th Cir. 1970)
- United States v. Perry (9th Cir. 1970)
- United States v. Spitzer (District Court, S.D. New York 1966)
- United States v. Rose (3d Cir. 1965)
- United States v. Dinerstein (District Court, E.D. New York 1964)
- United States v. O. G. Innes Corp. (District Court, S.D. New York 1962)
- Charles B. Solomon, Avery Tucker, Martin Weston and Joseph B. Mohr v. United States (6th Cir. 1960)
- United States v. Nathan L. Posner, Esquire, and S. Jerome Epstein, Executors of the Estate of Abraham Epstein, Deceased (3d Cir. 1959)
- United States v. Joseph Guzzone and Nicholas Guzzone (2d Cir. 1959)
- Kravitz Estate (Pa. 1965)
- Goldsby v. State (Miss. 1960)
- Hendrick v. Trafigura Trading, LLC (United States District Court for the District of Delaware 2022)
- Proffitt, Billy v. FDIC (D.C. Cir. 2000)
- State Ex Rel. Walker v. Giardina (W. Va. 1982)
- Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (Pa. 1963)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
KOLLER ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES.
Supreme Court of United States.
Robert H. Malis argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners.
Lionel Kestenbaum argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Samuel D. Slade.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed. Rex Trailer Co. v. United States, 350 U. S. 148 (1956).
MR. JUSTICE STEWART, with whom MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER join, dissenting.
I do not agree that disposition of this case is controlled by the decision in Rex Trailer Co. v. United States, 350 U. S. 148. Believing that § 26 (b) (1) of the Surplus Property Act of 1944, 40 U. S. C. § 489 (b) (1), imposes a civil penalty, and that an action thereunder is therefore subject to the five-year limitation provided in 28 U. S. C. § 2462, I would reverse. Cf. United States ex rel. Marcus v. Hess, 317 U. S. 537; Erie Basin Metal Products, Inc., v. United States, 150 F. Supp. 561 (Ct. Cl.). See Priebe & Sons v. United States, 332 U. S. 407.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.