Supreme Court of the United States, 1959

J. Aron & Co. v. Mississippi Shipping Co.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 14, 1959 · Per Curiam

361 U.S. 115; 80 S. Ct. 212; 4 L. Ed. 2d 148; 1959 U.S. LEXIS 90 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Eberhard P. Deutsch, Brunswick G. Deutsch and René H. Himel, Jr. ior petitioner.

Cases that cite this one

18 later published cases cite this decision. The 16 that cite it most often are listed here.

Oklahoma Radio Associates v. Federal Deposit Insurance (10th Cir. 1993)
Grace Line Inc. v. Grace Line Inc. (2d Cir. 1975)
Imperial Commodities Corp. v. Grace Line Inc. (2d Cir. 1975)
American Mail Line Ltd. v. United States (District Court, W.D. Washington 1974)
Theodories v. Hercules Navigation Co. (5th Cir. 1971)
Ferd Allen v. Paul B. Johnson, Individually and as Governor and State Election Commissioner of the State of Mississippi (5th Cir. 1969)
Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Gay Cottons, United States of America and Shalom Baby Wear (9th Cir. 1969)
Lebus v. Seafarers' International Union (5th Cir. 1968)
Lebus v. Seafarers' International Union of North America (5th Cir. 1968)
Suter v. Artist M. (Supreme Court of the United States 1992)
United States v. Honorable Irving Hill, United States District Judge (9th Cir. 1973)
State Ex Rel. Wikberg v. Henderson (La. 1974)
Cradle v. Cox (District Court, E.D. Virginia 1971)
Felix Ferina v. United States (8th Cir. 1965)
Mississippi Shipping Co., Inc. v. Zander and Company, Inc., and J. Aron & Company (5th Cir. 1960)
Mississippi Shipping Co., Inc., Claimant-Appellant v. Zander and Company, Inc., Libellants-Appellees (5th Cir. 1959)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It appearing from the petitioner’s suggestion of mootness that, subsequent to the judgment of reversal by the Court of Appeals of the original interlocutory decree of the District Court and the filing of the petition for writ of certiorari, a consent judgment for damages and costs was entered by the District Court, the petition for writ of cer-tiorari is granted, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to dismiss the appeal as moot.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.