ET & WNC TRANSPORTATION CO. v. Currie
ET & WNC TRANSPORTATION CO. v. Currie
359 U.S. 28; 79 S. Ct. 602; 3 L. Ed. 2d 625; 1959 U.S. LEXIS 1420
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
18 later published cases cite this decision.
- United States Tobacco Co. v. Commonwealth (Pa. 1978)
- United States Tobacco Co. v. State Tax Commission (Or. 1962)
- Santa Fe Natural Tabacco Co. v. Dept. of Rev. (Oregon Tax Court 2022)
- Chester A. Asher, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation (New Jersey Tax Court 2006)
- Schering-Plough Healthcare Products Sales Corp. v. Commonwealth (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2002)
- Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Department of Revenue (Ill. App. Ct. 2000)
- Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Delaware v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue (Wis. 1991)
- Chemical Realty Corp. v. Taxation Division Director (New Jersey Tax Court 1983)
- International Shoe Company v. Cocreham (La. 1964)
- Francese v. United States (District Court, E.D. New York 1964)
- State ex rel. Ciba Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. v. State Tax Commission (Mo. 1964)
- Mercury Motor Express, Inc. v. South Carolina Tax Commission (S.C. 1964)
- Moore Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Department of Taxation (Wis. 1961)
- James E. McDaniel Libelant-Appellant v. The M/s Lisholt, Her Engines, Etc., and A/s Lise, Her Owner (2d Cir. 1960)
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company, Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company v. United States Fo America (8th Cir. 1960)
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. United States (District Court, E.D. New York 1960)
- Yost v. General Electric Company (District Court, S.D. New York 1959)
- McDaniel v. The M/B Lisholt (District Court, S.D. New York 1959)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
E T & W N C TRANSPORTATION CO.
v.
CURRIE, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF NORTH CAROLINA.
Supreme Court of United States.
Kester Walton and James H. Epps, Jr. for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed. Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota, and Williams v. Stockham Valves & Fittings, Inc., 358 U. S. 450.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER, MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions in these cases.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.