Supreme Court of the United States, 1959

Legerlotz v. Rogers

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 12, 1959

361 U.S. 808; 1959 U.S. LEXIS 386; 80 S. Ct. 76 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Robert H. Reiter for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Townsend, George B. Searls and Irwin A. Seibel for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

United States Court of Appeals for the District-of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted. Counsel are directed to discuss in their briefs and oral arguments, among other questions, the question whether the amendment of a “Return Order,” as opposed to a “Notice of Intention to Return,” is permissible, under the pertinent regulations or otherwise, and, if not, the effect of such an amendment on' the pertinent limitations period.*

[Note: This sentence was added by an order entered October 19, 1959.] ■ ■

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.