Supreme Court of the United States, 1960

McGrath v. Rhay

McGrath v. Rhay
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 27, 1960 · Per Curiam
364 U.S. 279; 80 S. Ct. 1609; 4 L. Ed. 2d 1719; 1960 U.S. LEXIS 770 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Petitioners pro se., John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Stephen C. Way, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

McGrath v. Rhay

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondent’s motion to dismiss the writ of certio-rari is denied. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington is vacated and the case is remanded for determination of the following questions of Washington law now involved in the case: (1) whether the case is moot as a habeas corpus proceeding; and (2) if it is, whether, to avoid mootness, it can properly be treated as an application for some other form of appropriate relief.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.