Supreme Court of the United States, 1960

Bandy v. United States

Bandy v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 5, 1960 · Per Curiam
364 U.S. 477; 81 S. Ct. 244; 7 L. Ed. 2d 850; 1960 U.S. LEXIS 84 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Petitioner pro se., Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice and Meyer Rothwacks for the United States.

Bandy v. United States

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. In light of the circumstances pointed out by the Government surrounding the alleged inability of the petitioner to secure the services of his own handwriting expert, the error which occurred in the “Agreed Statement of the Case” and which was repeated by the Government in its brief and the Court of Appeals in its opinion, the failure to subpoena witnesses with respect to petitioner’s alibi, and the dispute which arose with respect to representation of petitioner by his appointed counsel on appeal, the judgment is vacated and the cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for a hearing of the appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.