Chaifetz v. United States
Chaifetz v. United States
366 U.S. 209
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
23 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Timoteo (Haw. 1997)
- United States v. Hankin, Perch, Perch P. Hankin (3d Cir. 1979)
- People v. Vallerga (Cal. Ct. App. 1977)
- William C. Coleman v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1961)
- State v. EW (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2010)
- State v. E.W. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2010)
- State v. N.S. (Wash. Ct. App. 2000)
- State v. Leonard (W. Va. 2000)
- Cane v. State (Del. 1989)
- State v. Sullivan (R.I. 1988)
- People v. Diedrich (Cal. 1982)
- Tucker v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
- United States v. Paul Levine (3d Cir. 1981)
- State v. Eppens (Wash. Ct. App. 1981)
- State v. Stillwell (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1980)
- State v. Glover (Wash. Ct. App. 1979)
- United States v. Claude C. Wild, Jr. (D.C. Cir. 1977)
- Padie v. State (Alaska 1976)
- Gurley v. State (Ind. 1976)
- Johnson v. State (Ind. 1976)
- State v. LaSelva (Conn. 1972)
- Pate v. District Court of Oklahoma County (Okla. Crim. App. 1966)
- Kenneth E. Waters v. United States (10th Cir. 1964)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Upon consideration of the entire record and the suggestion of the Solicitor General, the petition for writ of certiorari is granted limited to that part of the judgment concerned with Count IY of the indictment and that part of the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate the conviction on that Count. In all other respects the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.