Herrin Transp. Co. v. United States
Herrin Transp. Co. v. United States
366 U.S. 419; 81 S. Ct. 1356; 6 L. Ed. 2d 387; 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1118
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
51 later published cases cite this decision. The 22 that cite it most often are listed here.
- State Ex Rel. Philipp Transit Lines, Inc. v. Public Service Commission (Mo. 1977)
- Davis & Randall, Inc. v. United States (District Court, W.D. New York 1963)
- Idaho v. Interstate Commerce Commission (9th Cir. 1991)
- Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency (D.C. Cir. 1987)
- Kfc National Management Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board (2d Cir. 1974)
- Towne Services Household Goods Transportation Co. v. United States (District Court, W.D. Texas 1971)
- Braniff Airways, Incorporated v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Intervenor (D.C. Cir. 1967)
- Strickland Transportation Co. v. United States (District Court, N.D. Texas 1967)
- C & H Transportation Co. v. United States (District Court, N.D. Texas 1965)
- Gregory v. Missouri Pacific Railroad (5th Cir. 1994)
- Herold v. Burlington Northern, Inc. (8th Cir. 1985)
- United States v. Andreas (D. Minn. 1974)
- Buckner Trucking, Inc. v. United States (District Court, S.D. Texas 1973)
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. United States (District Court, W.D. Texas 1973)
- Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. v. United States (United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas 1973)
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. United States (District Court, E.D. Missouri 1970)
- Dale Verne Deremer v. United States (8th Cir. 1965)
- Hackensack Water Co. v. Borough of Upper Saddle River & Village of Ridgewood (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1965)
- United States v. Joan D. Hayes (4th Cir. 1963)
- Raul Pinto v. States Marine Corporation of Delaware (2d Cir. 1961)
- Glow v. Union Pacific Railroad (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2009)
- Haworth v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. (District Court, E.D. Washington 2003)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
HERRIN TRANSPORTATION CO.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Carl L. Phinney for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon, Robert W. Ginnane and James Y. Piper for the United States, and Ewell H. Muse, Jr. for Strickland Transportation Co., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.