Supreme Court of the United States, 1961

Winkle v. Bannan

Winkle v. Bannan
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided November 6, 1961 · Per Curiam
368 U.S. 34; 82 S. Ct. 146; 7 L. Ed. 2d 91; 1961 U.S. LEXIS 201 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Petitioner pro se., Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, Joseph B. Bilitzke, Solicitor General, and Robert Weinbaum, Assistant Solicitor General, for respondent.

Winkle v. Bannan

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and, as suggested by the Attorney General of Michigan, the case is remanded for consideration in light of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U. S. 643.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.