Supreme Court of the United States, 1962

Managed Funds, Inc. v. Brouk

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 16, 1962 · Frankfurter, White

369 U.S. 424; 82 S. Ct. 878; 8 L. Ed. 2d 6; 1962 U.S. LEXIS 2310 (United States Reports)

Counsel

B. Walston Chubb for petitioner., Forrest M. Hemker for Brouk et al. and William Stix for Baker et al., respondents., Solicitor General Cox, Daniel M. Friedman, Allan F. Conwill and Walter P. North for the Securities and Exchange Commission, as amicus curiae, urging reversal.

Cases that cite this one

22 later published cases cite this decision.

Harry R. Conover v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., and Brenton Ogden, and Sears, Roebuck & Co. (9th Cir. 1986)
Burks v. Lasker (Supreme Court of the United States 1979)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,889 Robert Abrahamson and Marjorie Abrahamson v. Malcolm K. Fleschner (2d Cir. 1978)
McMenomy v. Ryden (Minn. 1967)
Young v. Nationwide Life Insurance (District Court, S.D. Texas 1998)
McLachlan v. Simon (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1998)
Boland v. Engle (7th Cir. 1997)
Boland v. Engle (7th Cir. 1997)
King v. Douglass (District Court, S.D. Texas 1996)
Bancroft Convertible Fund, Inc. v. Zico Investment Holdings Inc. (1st Cir. 1987)
Bancroft Convertible Fund, Inc. v. Zico Investment Holdings Inc. (3d Cir. 1987)
Fogel v. Chestnutt (2d Cir. 1981)
Fogel v. Chestnutt (2d Cir. 1981)
Sullivan v. Chase Investment Services of Boston, Inc. (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1977)
Rose Moses v. C. Rodgers Burgin (1st Cir. 1971)
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,714 Edwin J. Herpich v. Robert H. Wallace, Jack E. Love (5th Cir. 1970)
The Greater Iowa Corporation v. Frank McLendon (8th Cir. 1967)
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Quing N. Wong (District Court, D. Puerto Rico 1967)
Nos. 13702-13705 (3d Cir. 1963)
Taussig v. Wellington Fund, Inc. (3d Cir. 1963)
Ruskay v. Reed (District Court, S.D. New York 1963)
Townsend Corporation of America v. Davidson (District Court, D. New Jersey 1963)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon the suggestion of mootness and the joint motion of counsel to vacate and remand, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the cause of action as to the respondents.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.