Supreme Court of the United States, 1962

Elchuk v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 25, 1962 · Frankfurter

370 U.S. 722; 82 S. Ct. 1574; 8 L. Ed. 2d 802; 1962 U.S. LEXIS 858 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Petitioner pro se., Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

Cases that cite this one

15 later published cases cite this decision.

Leon Bearden v. United States (5th Cir. 1963)
Lewis Charles Wheeler v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections (5th Cir. 1969)
Ghazi Abraham v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, Tallahassee, Florida (5th Cir. 1969)
William Alexander Tittle v. United States (5th Cir. 1969)
Grady v. Boutwell, Jr. v. Curtis M. Simpson, Warden (5th Cir. 1969)
Grant Heath v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida (5th Cir. 1969)
Alva Eugene Hemming, III v. United States (5th Cir. 1969)
James Berry, Jr. v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections (5th Cir. 1969)
James Waddell v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida (5th Cir. 1969)
Wallace Leroy Schiers v. The People of the State of California (9th Cir. 1964)
Johnnie Clifford McDowell v. United States (6th Cir. 1964)
Leon Bearden v. United States (5th Cir. 1962)
Charles Catalano v. United States (2d Cir. 1962)
Frank Doran Huizar v. United States (5th Cir. 1965)
Bearden v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1963)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. Upon the suggestion of the Solicitor General and an examination of the entire record, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings in which the petitioner is to be accorded the opportunity to present oral argument on the merits of his appeal, either personally or through counsel, to the same extent as such opportunity is accorded to the United States Attorney.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.