Creek Nation v. United States
Creek Nation v. United States
370 U.S. 157; 82 S. Ct. 1253; 8 L. Ed. 2d 402; 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1161
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
13 later published cases cite this decision.
- Tenold v. Weyerhaeuser Co. (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
- Highland Homes Ltd. v. State (Tex. 2014)
- Clymer v. Summit Bancorp. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1998)
- In re the November 8, 1996 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1998)
- In re Apportionment, State Legislature-1992 (Mich. 1992)
- Neff v. Secretary of State (Mich. 1992)
- Riggs National Bank of Washington, D.C. v. District of Columbia (D.C. 1990)
- Boswell v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. (Ariz. 1986)
- Blue Cross of Northern California v. Cory (Cal. Ct. App. 1981)
- Screen Actors Guild, Inc. v. Cory (Cal. Ct. App. 1979)
- Commonwealth v. Kervick (N.J. 1972)
- Duvall v. Moore (District Court, N.D. Iowa 1967)
- Brundage v. New Jersey Zinc Co. (N.J. 1967)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
CREEK NATION
v.
UNITED STATES.
Supreme Court of United States.
Paul M. Niebell argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.
Ralph A. Barney argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, Richard J. Medalie, Roger P. Marquis and Hugh Nugent.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.