Supreme Court of the United States, 1962

PENSICK & GORDON, INC. v. California Motor Express

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 3, 1962 · Harlan, Stewart, Hewitt-Robins

371 U.S. 184; 83 S. Ct. 264; 9 L. Ed. 2d 227; 1962 U.S. LEXIS 66 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Carl M. Gould for petitioner., Theodore W. Russell, George L. Catlin and Joseph P. Loeb for respondents.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Danna v. Air France (District Court, S.D. New York 1971)
Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau v. United States of America, Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau v. National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc. (8th Cir. 1970)
Pensick & Gordon, Inc. v. California Motor Express (9th Cir. 1963)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Hewitt-Robins Inc. v. Eastern Freight-Ways, Inc., ante, p. 84.

Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice White would affirm the judgment below for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion in Hewitt-Robins.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.