Supreme Court of the United States, 1962

Mercantile National Bank at Dallas v. Langdeau

Mercantile National Bank at Dallas v. Langdeau
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 2, 1962 · Cases, Consideration, Took
369 U.S. 834; 82 S. Ct. 864 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Hubert D. Johnson and Neth L. Leachman argued the cause for appellants., Marvin S. Sloman was with Mr. Johnson on the briefs for appellant in No. 90., Mr. Leachman was on the briefs for appellant in No. 91., Quentin Keith and W. E. Cureton argued the cause for appellee. With them on the briefs was Cecil C. Rotsch.

Mercantile National Bank at Dallas v. Langdeau

Opinion of the Court

Appeals from the Supreme Court of Texas. (Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction postponed to the hearing of the cases on the merits, 368 U. S. 809.)

These eases are restored to the calendar for reargument.

Reported below: 161 Tex. 349, 341 S. W. 2d 161.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.