HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA Et Al.

Supreme Court of the United States April 15, 1963

HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA Et Al., 372 U.S. 710 (1963)

83 S. Ct. 1020; 10 L. Ed. 2d 126; 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1815

Clark, Douglas, Harlan, Per Curiam, White

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360. Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Reference

Full Case Name: Nathan Boyd Holmes v. California
Cited By: 4 cases
Status: Published