Smith v. Mississippi
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- John A. Hutter Et Ux. v. Bernard J. Korzen, Etc (Supreme Court of the United States 1972)
- Darden v. Wainwright (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 1981)
- Smith v. Breazeale (District Court, N.D. Mississippi 1965)
- Massachusetts v. Painten (Supreme Court of the United States 1968)
- Johnson v. Massachusetts (Supreme Court of the United States 1968)
- Marrero Laffosse v. Marshal (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1963)
- Marrero Laffosse v. Márshal Sección de lo Criminal, Tribunal Superior, Sala de San Juan (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico 1963)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The petitioner was convicted of rape by a jury in the Circuit Court of Madison County, Mississippi, and sentenced to death. The conviction was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Mississippi. - Miss. —, 139 So. 2d 857. We granted petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in jorma pauperis, and his petition for certiorari which presented several claims of alleged denial of rights secured to him by the Fourteenth Amendment. 371 U. S. 939! After oral argument and study of the record, we have reached the conclusion that the record is not sufficient to permit decision of his constitutional claims. The writ kiherefore dismissed as improvidently granted, with *239 out prejudice to an application for federal habeas corpus relief under 28 U. S. C. § 2241 after exhaustion of any state remedies still open to him. See 28 U. S. C. § 2254; Fay v. Noia, 372 U. S. 391, 435.
Upon the effective date of our action today, the stay of execution granted October 5, 1962, by Mr. Justice Black expires of its own terms. We see no reason, however, to continue the stay in effect. Although the Mississippi Supreme Court, see —r Miss. —, 145 So. 2d 688, reserved to the State the right, upon this Court’s disposition of the writ of certiorari, to apply for an order fixing a new execution date, we assume that that court will not act on application of the State without affording petitioner an opportunity to pursue with due diligence any available state remedies and, if necessary, the remedy in federal habeas corpus.
Writ dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.