Jones, Chairman of Navajo Tribal Council of Navajo Indian Tribe v. Healing, Chairman of Hopi Council of Hopi Indian Tribe
Cases that cite this one
71 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Abbott Sekaquaptewa, Etc. v. Peter MacDonald Etc., Griffin B. Bell, Etc. (9th Cir. 1978)
- Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald (United States District Court for the District of Arizona 1978)
- Masayesva v. Hale (9th Cir. 1997)
- Masayesva v. Zah (United States District Court for the District of Arizona 1992)
- SEKAQUAPTEWA v. MacDONALD (9th Cir. 1980)
- Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald (9th Cir. 1980)
- Hamilton v. Macdonald (9th Cir. 1974)
- Hamilton v. MacDonald (9th Cir. 1974)
- Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior v. Norman M. Littell (D.C. Cir. 1964)
- Karuk Tribe of California v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 1998)
- Benally v. Hodel (9th Cir. 1991)
- Benally v. Hodel (9th Cir. 1990)
- Begay v. United States (Court of Claims 1987)
- Nancy Walker v. Navajo-Hopi Indian Relocation Commission (9th Cir. 1984)
- SEKAQUAPTEWA v. MacDONALD (9th Cir. 1980)
- Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald (9th Cir. 1980)
- United States v. Joe and Wanda Kabinto, His Wife (9th Cir. 1972)
- Navajo Nation v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2011)
- Hopi Tribe v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2002)
- Clinton v. Babbitt (9th Cir. 1999)
- Secakuku v. Navajo Nation (United States District Court for the District of Arizona 1997)
- United States v. Robert David Sirois (2d Cir. 1996)
- Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. Thompson (District Court, W.D. Wisconsin 1996)
- The Hopi Tribe, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. The Navajo Tribe, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. United States of America (9th Cir. 1995)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
JONES, CHAIRMAN OF NAVAJO TRIBAL COUNCIL OF NAVAJO INDIAN TRIBE,
v.
HEALING, CHAIRMAN OF HOPI COUNCIL OF HOPI INDIAN TRIBE, ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Norman M. Littell and Frederick Bernays Wiener for appellant in No. 985 and for appellee Jones in No. 1050.
John S. Boyden, Allen H. Tibbals and Bryant H. Croft for appellants in No. 1050 and for appellee Healing in No. 985.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to substitute Raymond Nakai in the place of Paul Jones as the party appellant in No. 985 and as a party appellee in No. 1050 is granted. The motion to substitute Abbott Sekaquaptewa in the place of Dewey Healing as a party appellee in No. 985 and as a party appellant in No. 1050 is granted. The motion to affirm in No. 985 is granted and the judgment which is common to both cases is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and would decide the cases only after argument.
NOTES
[*] Together with No. 1050, Healing, Chairman of Hopi Tribal Council of Hopi Indian Tribe, et al. v. Jones, Chairman of Navajo Tribal Council of Navajo Indian Tribe, et al., on appeal from the same Court.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.