Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of the United States, 1963

Huggins v. Raines

Huggins v. Raines
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 10, 1963 · Per Curiam
374 U.S. 105; 83 S. Ct. 1688; 10 L. Ed. 2d 1027; 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1283 (United States Reports)
Huggins v. Raines

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

374 U.S. 105 (1963)

HUGGINS
v.
RAINES, WARDEN.

No. 251, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 10, 1963.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF OKLAHOMA.

Petitioner pro se.

Mac Q. Williamson, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Lewis A. Wallace and Hugh H. Collum, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma for reconsideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335, and Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U. S. 506.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.