Supreme Court of the United States, 1963

Shockey v. Illinois

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 14, 1963 · Harlan, Kansas

375 U.S. 22; 84 S. Ct. 83; 11 L. Ed. 2d 43; 1963 U.S. LEXIS 531 (United States Reports)

Counsel

John R. Snively for petitioner., William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

13 later published cases cite this decision.

Donnell v. Swenson (District Court, W.D. Missouri 1966)
Herbert Eugene Blanchard v. Lou v. Brewer, Warden (8th Cir. 1970)
Horace Edward Williams v. United States (8th Cir. 1968)
The People v. Washington (Ill. 1967)
Shipman v. Gladden (Or. 1969)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Stevens v. Myers (Pa. 1965)
The PEOPLE v. Keeney (Ill. 1970)
People ex rel. Mitchell v. Fay (District Court, S.D. New York 1965)
The People v. Bush (Ill. 1965)
The PEOPLE v. Dean (Ill. 1964)
The PEOPLE v. Struck (Ill. 1963)
Henry v. City of Rock Hill (Supreme Court of the United States 1964)
The PEOPLE v. Shockey (Ill. 1964)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Illinois for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

Mr. Justice Harlan, for the reasons stated in Daegele v. Kansas, ante, p. 1, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.