Supreme Court of the United States, 1963

Tabb v. California

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 14, 1963 · Harlan, Kansas

375 U.S. 27; 84 S. Ct. 90; 11 L. Ed. 2d 44; 1963 U.S. LEXIS 536 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Petitioner pro se., Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Stevens v. Myers (Pa. 1965)
Donnell v. Swenson (District Court, W.D. Missouri 1966)
State v. Hunt (Ariz. 1978)
People v. Chrisman (Cal. Ct. App. 1967)
People v. Chrisman (Cal. Ct. App. 1967)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of California for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

Mr. Justice Harlan, for the reasons stated in Daegele v. Kansas, ante, p. 1, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.