Stuart v. Wilson
Stuart v. Wilson
371 U.S. 576; 83 S. Ct. 547; 9 L. Ed. 2d 537; 1963 U.S. LEXIS 2232
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Idaho Ass'n of Naturopathic Physicians v. United States Food & Drug Administration (4th Cir. 1978)
- Beck v. McLeod (District Court, E.D. South Carolina 1965)
- Reisinger v. Commonwealth (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1979)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
STUART ET AL.
v.
WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
James L. McNees, Jr. for appellants.
Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, Sam R. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, and Tom I. McFarling, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.