Head v. California
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Spradley v. Spaniol (District Court, District of Columbia 1988)
- Harold R. Swenson, Warden, Missouri State Penitentiary v. William B. Donnell (8th Cir. 1967)
- Hugh E. Maness v. Harold R. Swenson, Warden, Missouri State Penitentiary (8th Cir. 1967)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
HEAD
v.
CALIFORNIA.
Supreme Court of United States.
Petitioner pro se.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and A. Wallace Tashima, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted but the motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari is denied. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.