Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of the United States, 1963

Harris v. California

Harris v. California
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 17, 1963 · Per Curiam
374 U.S. 499 (United States Reports)
Harris v. California

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

374 U.S. 499 (1963)

HARRIS
v.
CALIFORNIA ET AL.

No. 135, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 17, 1963.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.

Petitioner pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.