Traub v. Connecticut
Traub v. Connecticut
374 U.S. 493; 83 S. Ct. 1899
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
22 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Byers (Wash. 1977)
- State v. Byers (Wash. 1975)
- Logan v. State (Ala. 1973)
- Bynum v. State (Okla. Crim. App. 1971)
- Clarence Collins v. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections (5th Cir. 1965)
- People v. Bilderbach (Cal. 1965)
- James Gregory Jones v. Superintendent of Rahway State Prison and the Attorney General of the State of New Jersey (3d Cir. 1984)
- Robinson v. Smith (District Court, W.D. New York 1978)
- Martin v. Donnelly (District Court, D. Massachusetts 1974)
- Commonwealth v. Garvin (Pa. 1972)
- State v. Palmer (Wash. Ct. App. 1971)
- Anthony Ellsworth Dearinger v. B. J. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, Walla Walla, Washington (9th Cir. 1970)
- State v. Woods (Wash. Ct. App. 1970)
- United States ex rel. Foreman v. Casseles (District Court, S.D. New York 1970)
- Lawrence v. Henderson (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1970)
- People v. Harris (Ill. App. Ct. 1969)
- United States ex rel. Walters v. Reincke (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 1969)
- Ben Herbert Phelper v. Bill Decker, Sheriff of Dallas County, Texas (5th Cir. 1968)
- People v. Wheeler (Cal. Ct. App. 1966)
- United States of America Ex Rel. Charles Glinton, Relator-Appellant v. Wilfred L. Denno, as Warden of Sing Sing Prison, Ossining, New York (2d Cir. 1964)
- People v. Fields (Ill. App. Ct. 1975)
- Commonwealth v. Bishop (Pa. 1967)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
TRAUB
v.
CONNECTICUT.
Supreme Court of United States.
Petitioner pro se.
John D. LaBelle and Harry W. Hultgren, Jr. for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U. S. 471, and Ker v. California, ante, p. 23.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.