Supreme Court of the United States, 1963

Regalado v. California

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 17, 1963 · Harlan

374 U.S. 497 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Petitioner pro se., Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California,.William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and S. Clark Moore, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Regalado v. California (Supreme Court of the United States 1963)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of California is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Ker v. California, ante, p. 23, and McDonald v. United States, 335 U. S. 451.

Mr. Justice Harlan concurs in the result.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.