Supreme Court of the United States, 1963

Lemmon v. Robertson

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 14, 1963 · Douglas, Noted, Should

375 U.S. 5; 84 S. Ct. 40; 11 L. Ed. 2d 37; 1963 U.S. LEXIS 501 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Jay W. Scovel for appellants., Appellees pro se.

Cases that cite this one

21 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Vincent Moran Doss (6th Cir. 1977)
In re Subpoenas to Local 478, International Union of Operating Engineers and Benefit Funds (2d Cir. 1983)
In the Matter of the Grand Jury Subpoena Served on John Doe (2d Cir. 1976)
In re Grand Jury Proceedings. In re Jacqueline Schofield, Witness (3d Cir. 1973)
In re Grand Jury Application (District Court, S.D. New York 1985)
United States v. Allen M. Dorfman, (Two Cases). Appeal of David Dorfman Appeal of William E. Webbe. United States of America v. Allen M. Dorfman (7th Cir. 1982)
Exxon Corporation and Gulf Oil Corporation, Mobil Oil Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission (D.C. Cir. 1981)
People v. Hower (Colo. App. 1981)
United States v. Boggs (District Court, D. Montana 1980)
Christian v. United States (D.C. 1978)
United States v. Armco Steel Corp. (District Court, W.D. Missouri 1978)
Robert Hawthorne, Inc. v. Director of Internal Revenue (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1976)
United States v. M. Jeanne Stone (United States District Court for the District of Delaware 1973)
United States v. John Doe. In the Matter of Grand Jury Proceeding: Application of Daniel Ellsberg for Protective Order (1st Cir. 1972)
Application of Andrew T. Bova v. United States (2d Cir. 1972)
United States v. Thomas George (6th Cir. 1971)
United States v. Grand Jury, and Henry M. Huffman, President, H & M Construction Company (5th Cir. 1970)
Jacobs v. Tenney (United States District Court for the District of Delaware 1970)
In the Matter of the Testimony of Warren E. Buckey Before the Grand Jury. Donovan Wire & Iron Company and Irwin Fruchtman (6th Cir. 1968)
James Miller v. United States (2d Cir. 1968)
Tibor Horvath v. Emerico Letay, Also Known as Imre Letay, the Chase Manhattan Bank, Non-Party (2d Cir. 1965)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The motion of appellees, Lewis Woodard and May Woodard, for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.