Supreme Court of the United States, 1964

City of Seattle v. Beezer

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 2, 1964 · Per Curiam

376 U.S. 224; 11 L. Ed. 2d 656; 84 S. Ct. 709; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1705 (United States Reports)

Counsel

A. L. Newbould, Richard S. White, William A. Helsell, Robert L. McCarty and Charles F. Wheatley, Jr. for appellants., Alfred J. Schweppe for Beezer, and Clarence C. Dill, Joseph Volpe, Jr. and Bennett Boskey for Public Utility-District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County, Washington, appellees., Solicitor General Cox, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock and David J. Bardin for the Federal Power Commission, as amicus curiae, in support of appellants.

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision. The 4 that cite it most often are listed here.

City Of Seattle v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (9th Cir. 1991)
City of Seattle v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (9th Cir. 1991)
Chapman v. Public Utility District No. 1 (9th Cir. 1966)
State v. Coleman (N.J. 1965)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of Tacoma, 357 U. S. 320.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.