Supreme Court of the United States, 1964

Fawcett Publications, Inc. v. Morris

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 4, 1964 · Black, Douglas

376 U.S. 513 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Howard Ellis, Perry S. Patterson, Don H. Reuben and Thomas A. Diskin for appellant., C. E. Ram Morrison for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

Floyd B. Burchett, Complainant-Appellee v. Bardahl Oil Company and Nance & Associates, Ltd. (10th Cir. 1973)
United Medical Laboratories, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. (District Court, D. Oregon 1966)
Pratt v. Nelson (Utah Ct. App. 2005)
Sovik v. Healing Network (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
Tatum v. Philip Morris Inc. (10th Cir. 1993)
McCullough v. Cities Service Co. (Okla. 1984)
Peisner v. Detroit Free Press, Inc. (Mich. Ct. App. 1976)
Corn v. Shelton Equipment & Machine Co. (United States District Court, Oklahoma Western 1966)
Fawcett Publications, Inc. v. Morris (Supreme Court of the United States 1964)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted or that the petition for writ of certiorari should be granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.