Supreme Court of the United States, 1964

Publishers' Ass'n v. New York Mailers' Union No. Six

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 6, 1964 · Per Curiam

376 U.S. 775; 84 S. Ct. 1132; 12 L. Ed. 2d 82; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1491 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Andrew L. Hughes argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner., Sidney Sugerman argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Gerhard P. Van Arkel and George Kaufmann.

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

New York Telephone Company v. Communications Workers of America, Afl-Cio (2d Cir. 1971)
Texas-Capital Contractors, Inc. v. James Abdnor, Administrator, United States Small Business Administration (5th Cir. 1990)
Bohack Corp. v. Truck Drivers Local Union No. 807, International Brotherhood of Teamsters (District Court, E.D. New York 1977)
National Labor Relations Board v. C & C Plywood Corp. (Supreme Court of the United States 1967)
International Union Of Electrical, Radio And Machine Workers (Afl-Cio) v. General Electric Company (2d Cir. 1965)
International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. General Electric Co. (2d Cir. 1965)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon the respondent’s suggestion of mootness the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals is vacated insofar as it reversed the stay provision of the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss as moot that portion of the complaint seeking such a stay.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.