Marks v. Esperdy
Marks v. Esperdy
377 U.S. 214; 84 S. Ct. 1224; 12 L. Ed. 2d 292; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1278
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
13 later published cases cite this decision.
- Angela Morris Amado Rocha v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1st Cir. 1965)
- United States v. Yakou, Sabri (D.C. Cir. 2005)
- United States v. Sabri Yakou (D.C. Cir. 2005)
- Roni David Marciano v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (8th Cir. 1971)
- Leonard Express, Inc. v. United States (District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania 1969)
- Howard v. Lufkin (Cal. Ct. App. 1988)
- Coburn v. State Personnel Board (Cal. Ct. App. 1978)
- Dillard v. LaVallee (District Court, E.D. New York 1977)
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Franchise Tax Board (Cal. Ct. App. 1970)
- JOLLEY (Board of Immigration Appeals 1970)
- Tri-D Truck Leves, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission (District Court, D. Kansas 1969)
- Rock Island Motor Transit Co. v. United States (District Court, S.D. Iowa 1966)
- Service Trucking Co. v. United States (District Court, D. Maryland 1965)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
MARKS
v.
ESPERDY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE.
Supreme Court of United States.
Murray A. Gordon argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.
Charles Gordon argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and L. Paul Winings.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN took no part in the decision of this case.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.