Supreme Court of the United States, 1964

Dresner v. City of Tallahassee

Dresner v. City of Tallahassee
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 12, 1964 · Per Curiam
378 U.S. 539; 84 S. Ct. 1895; 12 L. Ed. 2d 1018; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 829 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Howard Dixon and Carl Rachlin argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs were Alfred I. Hopkins and Tobias Simon., Edward J. Hill and Roy T. Rhodes argued the cause for respondent. With them on the brief was Rivers Buford, Jr.

Dresner v. City of Tallahassee

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The questions which this Court certified to the Supreme Court of Florida, 375 U. S. 136, having been answered in the affirmative, 164 So. 2d 208, the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. 28 U. S. C. § 1257.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.