Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of the United States, 1964

Doughty v. Maxwell

Doughty v. Maxwell
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided February 24, 1964 · Per Curiam
376 U.S. 202; 84 S. Ct. 702; 11 L. Ed. 2d 650; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1732 (United States Reports)

Doughty v. Maxwell

Opinion

376 U.S. 202 (1964)

DOUGHTY
v.
MAXWELL, WARDEN.

No. 422, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 24, 1964.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.

Petitioner pro se.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and William C. Baird, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U. S. 506, Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑