Supreme Court of the United States, 1964

Doughty v. Maxwell

Doughty v. Maxwell
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided February 24, 1964 · Per Curiam
376 U.S. 202; 84 S. Ct. 702; 11 L. Ed. 2d 650; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1732 (United States Reports)
Doughty v. Maxwell

Cases that cite this one

126 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

376 U.S. 202 (1964)

DOUGHTY
v.
MAXWELL, WARDEN.

No. 422, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 24, 1964.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.

Petitioner pro se.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and William C. Baird, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U. S. 506, Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.