Senk v. Pennsylvania
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Commonwealth v. Senk (Pa. 1981)
- United States of America Ex Rel. Edwin Gockley v. David N. Myers, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Graterford, Pennsylvania (3d Cir. 1969)
- Commonwealth v. Senk (Pa. Super. Ct. 1990)
- Frank Earl Senk v. Charles H. Zimmerman, Superintendent and Leroy Zimmerman, Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania (3d Cir. 1989)
- United States of America, Ex Rel., Frank Earl Senk, S-0026 v. J. R. Brierley, Superintendent (3d Cir. 1973)
- State v. Ussery (Mo. 1970)
- United States of America Ex Rel. Frank Earl Senk v. H. E. Russell, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania (3d Cir. 1968)
- United States ex rel. Gockley v. Myers (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1967)
- Commonwealth v. Bartman (Pa. Super. Ct. 1976)
- Commonwealth v. Mervin (Pa. Super. Ct. 1974)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
SENK
v.
PENNSYLVANIA.
Supreme Court of United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.