Supreme Court of the United States, 1964

Aronoff v. Franchise Tax Board

Aronoff v. Franchise Tax Board
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 20, 1964 · No. 639
375 U.S. 451; 84 S. Ct. 525; 11 L. Ed. 2d 477; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1961 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Thomas W. LeSage for appellants., Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman, Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.

Aronoff v. Franchise Tax Board

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.