Supreme Court of the United States, 1964

United States v. California

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 18, 1964 · Application, Consideration, Motion, Took

377 U.S. 926 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Solicitor General Cox for the United States., Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, for defendant. Movant pro se., Solicitor General Cox for.the United States in opposition to the motion for leave to file petition for intervention. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and Howard S. Goldin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of California in opposition to motion for leave to file petition for intervention and for leave to file brief as amicus curiae.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

South Carolina v. North Carolina (Supreme Court of the United States 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The joint application for an extension of time for filing answering briefs and for allowance of time for filing reply briefs is granted. Answering briefs shall be filed on or before June 15, 1964, and reply briefs shall be filed on or before July 30, 1964. The motion of Carl Whitson for leave to file a petition for intervention is denied but the alternative motion for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application and motion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.