Supreme Court of the United States, 1964

Palermo v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided June 1, 1964 · Consideration, Douglas, Granted, Petitions, Should, Took

377 U.S. 953; 84 S. Ct. 1627 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Jacob Kossman for petitioner in No. 122., Russell E. Parsons for petitioner in No. 134., William B. Beirne, A. L. Wirin and Fred Okrand for petitioner in No. 141., William R. Ming, Jr. and Loren Miller for petitioner in No. 145., Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States. Robert W. Kenny for the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition in No. 141.

Cases that cite this one

15 later published cases cite this decision.

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,293 United States of America v. Lewis L. Colasurdo (2d Cir. 1971)
United States v. William Ragland (2d Cir. 1967)
United States v. Roy B. Kelly, Cecil v. Hagen and Milton J. Shuck (2d Cir. 1965)
United States v. Jimmie L. Ward (9th Cir. 1990)
State v. Morales (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Tresvant v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Zinn v. State (Ind. Ct. App. 1981)
United States v. Abraham T. Oliva (5th Cir. 1974)
United States v. Gary Bowdach (5th Cir. 1974)
United States v. Louis Nakaladski, A/K/A Louis Nash, Ettore Coco, A/K/A Eddie Coco (5th Cir. 1973)
United States v. Andrew J. Lococo (9th Cir. 1972)
United States v. David Paul Castanon, United States of America v. Antonio Oliveres Lopez (9th Cir. 1972)
United States v. Anthony Nicholas Carrion, United States of America v. Michael Anthony Carrion (9th Cir. 1972)
United States v. James Demasi (2d Cir. 1971)
United States v. Dominic Carzoli (7th Cir. 1971)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Reported below: 314 F. 2d 718.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.